A team of health department visited
Food Business Establishments in Dharamshala to keep a tab on adulteration of
food and sweets. The team consisted of Medical Officer Health Dr RK Sood, BMO
Shahpur Dr Sushil Sharma & FSO Manjeet Singh.
Advisories were issued to those
establishments who failed to comply with the Food Safety and
Standards Act of 2006.
Very often food is adulterated
by merchants and traders who are unscrupulous and want to make a quick profit.
Adulterated food is dangerous because it may be toxic and can affect
health and it could deprive nutrients essential for proper growth and
development.
Dr RK Sood taking to HR said that we
need to educate people. This is not to harass common people, but to
ensure food safety and health of people. This will check
adulteration, which pays major role in serious diseases like cancer, kidney
failure, and allergies. Similar checks were being conducted throughout the
district by BMOs.
He reiterated that
every food business operator should have valid licence under FSSA
2006 or he has to face imprisonment upto six months and or fine upto 5 lakhs.
The deadline for this is Feb 2014. Food Safety and Standards
Act, 2006 which consolidates various acts & orders that have hitherto
handled food related issues in various Ministries and Departments.
The law lays down science based standards for articles of food and to
regulate their manufacture, storage, distribution, sale and import to ensure
availability of safe and wholesome food for human
consumption.
FSSA 2006
|
|
Penalty for
selling food not of the nature or substance or quality demanded.
|
Penalty not exceeding five lakh
rupees.
|
Penalty for
sub-standard food.
|
Penalty which may extend to five
lakh rupees.
|
Penalty for misbranded food.
|
Penalty which may extend to three
lakh rupees.
|
Penalty for misleading
advertisement.
|
Penalty which may extend to ten
lakh rupees.
|
Penalty
for food containing extraneous matter.
|
Penalty which may extend to one
lakh rupees.
|
Penalty for possessing adulterant.
where such adulterant is not injurious to health
|
Penalty not exceeding two lakh
rupees;
|
Penalty for possessing adulterant.
where such adulterant is injurious to health
|
Penalty not exceeding ten lakh
rupees.
|
Penalty for contraventions for
which no specific penalty is provided.
|
Penalty which may extend to two
lakh rupees.
|
Health activists have welcomes this
move, “people had no fear of law. We Indians, when we go abroad obey all rules
for fear of prosecution and strict punishment. This landmark move will go a
long way in curbing such practices and promoting the food safety in
the region”.
Food is declared adulterated if
a substance is added which depreciates or injuriously affects it, cheaper or
inferior substances are substituted wholly or in part; any valuable or
necessary constituent has been wholly or in part abstracted; It is an
imitation; It is colored or otherwise treated, to improve its appearance or if
it contains any added substance injurious to health, or for whatever reasons
its quality is below the Standard.
A lack of awareness, negligence,
indifference and lethargy among consumers and inadequate enforcement
of foodlaws and food safety measures also lead
to food adulteration. We may be eating a dangerous dye, sawdust,
soapstone, industrial starch, and aluminum foil etc.
They demanded that all designated
officers should also use their powers and act to safeguard the health of the
public, as action can also be taken against
the food safety officer for not fulfilling their role.
The Food Safety Officer shall be liable to a penalty which may
extend up to one lakh rupee if he / she is found to be guilty of an offence
under section 39 of the Act.
Critical shifts from Prevention
of Food Adulteration Act (PFA) to FSSA
|
|
PFA
|
FSSA
|
Multiple Authorities
|
Single Authority
|
Adulteration
|
Safety
|
Inspection / Control
|
Monitoring Surveillance
|
Insufficient Enforcement Personnel
|
Full time district
Officer, Food Safety officer under FSC
|
No comments:
Post a Comment