Pages

China’s food official calls for more testing to tackle issues in sector

A leading official from China's food and drug watchdog has called for enhanced testing to tackle outstanding issues in the country's food and drug sector.

According to a Xinhua report, Sun Xianze, a member of the Communist Party of China group of the China Food and Drug Administration, has urged food and drug regulators to avoid and resolve risks by relying on science and technology and enhance their testing capabilities.

Overall, the country's food and drug sector features steady growth, but outstanding problems such as unbalanced development in the food industry and high-tech counterfeiting in the pharmaceutical field remain, the statement quoted Sun as saying at a recent symposium.

To address these problems, a food and drug testing system incorporating governmental testing agencies at the national and local levels, as well as third-party testing organisations, should be established, Sun said.

Siemens opens retail stores; to display free-standing, in-built appliances

Siemens Home Appliances, a leading player in built-in kitchen appliances from Europe, together with a leading dealer – Audio Voice, inaugurated their exclusive retail brand store in the national capital recently.

Located in Lajpat Nagar, the store is spread across a 1,600 sq ft retail space displaying the latest Siemens free-standing and built-in appliances, this includes Black Series -  the latest built-in range of Siemens home appliances which consists of dishwashers, ovens, hobs, hoods, and refrigerators.

Commenting on the expansion, Ajaz Vakil, GM, sales, built-in appliances, Siemens Home Appliances India, said, “North has always been an important market for us as it has huge potential. With our expansion in the city, we take this opportunity to cater to the young, enthusiastic and educated crowd who are open to embrace new, innovative and advanced technologies, with a range of Siemens home appliances.”

Feature: Calculating the Cost of Food Quality

As the old saying goes, “buy cheap, buy twice”. We’ve all been in a situation where we opted for a less expensive product only to regret it later due to it falling apart earlier than expected, or requiring costly upkeep. Making a purchasing decision solely on the price tag of the product in front of you is never a good idea and nowhere is this truer than when selecting a product inspection machine for your food processing line.

To comply with safety regulations in the food industry as well as metrology legislation, it is critical to make use of product inspection systems, such as metal detectors, checkweighers or x-ray inspection equipment. These technologies are vital for identifying and rejecting products contaminated with foreign bodies, including metal, glass or stone, instances of over- or underweight products, and packs with broken or misshapen components. However, selecting the wrong product inspection equipment for your line can add unnecessary expense through maintenance, wasted product or increased downtime while also putting your ability to comply with regulations at risk.

It is important that, prior to taking that financial plunge, you ask yourself, “What are the costs to my processing line of this product inspection machine? What are the benefits”? To facilitate this decision, we’ve compiled a simple checklist of issues to be taken into consideration when calculating the benefits of your product inspection system.

Does it meet the needs of your production line?
Before making a purchasing decision regarding new product inspection equipment, it is important for you to consider the needs of your line. Do you require a machine to detect metal or glass, or other physical contaminants? Is product weight a principal concern? Are you having issues with missing or broken components in your finished packs?

If the first is the biggest challenge for your production line, you should consider a metal detector or x-ray inspection system. A checkweigher would be the most suitable technology for the inspection of product weight, while an x-ray system would be ideal for overcoming the third challenge. You may require a range of product inspection equipment on your line to comply with industry safety standards, such as the British Retail Consortium (BRC) Global Standards, or legislation including the UK’s 1985 Weights and Measures Act, while ensuring other quality parameters are met.

To determine the needs of your line regarding contaminant detection and guarantee that the correct investment is being made, be sure to undertake a comprehensive Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) audit of your manufacturing processes. This is an in-depth study that forms the basis of many food safety standards, including BRC Global Standards and other Global Food Safety Initiative (GFSI) approved guidelines. It helps you identify the points in your processes most vulnerable to contamination as well as the most likely forms of contamination that will occur. For example, if the principal contaminant threat is from metal fragments, then a metal detector would be the ideal technology to invest in. If glass shards or bones or stones are more likely, then an x-ray inspection system would be more suitable.

As well as deciding what the most suitable technology will be for your production line, you should look at which other features you might need to ensure compliance with food safety and quality standards. Product inspection systems with due diligence enhancements, such as lockable reject bins and HMIs accessible only using a high-security password, for example, can eliminate the risk of tampering that can result in rejected products being replaced on the processing line or in unauthorised adjustments to the machine’s operating settings. Some product inspection systems are capable of storing records of login attempts to help you to identify when access to the system has been attempted and by whom. It is important to identify the control and security needs of your processing line by researching the requirements of the safety regulations to which you must comply.

How does the cost of installation weigh against the savings?
On top of the machine’s initial price tag, it is important to take into account the installation costs. These include production downtime due to integration of the new technology and the cost of engineering time for set up. You should take into account the disposal of the old equipment, and the time spent training staff to ensure they understand and can operate the new system.

Be sure you have selected product inspection equipment that is easy to install on existing lines. Machines that have a small footprint or combination systems, such as those featuring metal detection and checkweighing, can be integrated simply into processing lines with restricted space. Metal detection systems with Internal Cancellation Field (ICF) technology can be located next to other machinery without compromising detection sensitivity, further facilitating installation.

Pay attention to the nature of the Human Machine Interface (HMI) of the product inspection system you are considering. Features such as digital touchscreens and intuitive software can make the technology much more straightforward for your staff to use, minimising training time and expense. They can also simplify the setup of the new technology for your production line, saving you time and allowing your line to return to production as quickly as possible.

What are the perks of precision?
Is the product inspection system sensitive enough? Inspection precision can have a major impact on your production line, not just enhancing detection capability for physical contaminants, but enabling you to minimise costly product waste.

The installation of a more sensitive metal detector or x-ray inspection system than alternative solutions can minimise costly false rejects where compliant product is inaccurately deemed non-confirming.  It can also eliminate the threat of false positives, which are contaminated products that pass undetected through the processing line, and therefore decrease the likelihood of an expensive product recall with the financial sanctions and damage to reputation that can result. Metal detectors or x-ray inspection systems that are more sensitive than alternatives can ensure you detect ever smaller foreign bodies in your products, maximising consumer safety.

Consider a line processing 100 packs per minute, operating for 20 hours per day, 250 days a year. The typical cost per pack is €1. If a standard metal detector has a false reject rate of 1 pack per 5000, then as many as 6000 packs per year will be wrongly removed from the line, wasting some €6000 each year, in addition to the time and expense of reworking the product. However, if you choose a more sensitive metal detector, with a reject rate of just 1 pack per 10 000 packs, then your line will have a false reject rate of just 3000 packs per year, with a saving of €3000.

By installing a checkweigher on your line, you can identify instances of product under- and overfill. This not only enables you to comply with weights and measures legislation, it can help you save money from wasted product given away in overfilled packs that can be removed from production and reworked.

Imagine that a processing line fills 20 cans per minute.  Production occurs in three seven-hour shifts, 230 days per year.  If an average overfill of 10 grams per can was found and the costs for the content of the can amounts to €0.0001 per gram, this results in €5,796 loss per year.  By using a checkweigher to identify this overfill, the line could regain much of this lost profit every year. If you invest in a more sensitive checkweigher, able to measure weight with greater accuracy than alternative systems, you can set it to tighter tolerances to catch even minor instances of product overfill so you can reduce waste. If you are able to reduce average overfill to just 5 grams, for example, you would save €2,898 each year.

Additional checkweighing features, such as feedback control, can also result in financial gain. This innovative technology connects with the filling machines earlier in the production line and controls their output based on data from the checkweighing system. It automatically reduces or increases portion sizes according to weighing information in real time, minimising expensive product overfill.

What about the spare parts?
Have you considered the availability of spare parts for the product inspection equipment you intend to purchase? Will your machine require extensive maintenance in the coming years? The robustness of the technology should be evaluated as maintenance and repair can impact the total cost of owning any machine.

Machines designed to operate in humid conditions and withstand harsh wash-down regimes have low maintenance needs for optimum performance. Check the Ingress Protection (IP) rating of the product inspection machine to ensure it is able to withstand the humidity and chemical environment of your production line. Features such as granulate conveyor systems with extra wide belts and mechanism casings milled from a single block of plastic can protect the conveyor motors and rollers from the damaging effects of ingress of granular or particulate products, such as salt or sugar. These can lead to premature corrosion or increase friction between components, increasing maintenance requirements.

Speak to your supplier to determine the availability of any necessary spare parts. Product inspection systems with non-standard central processing units (CPUs) may be more difficult and more expensive to maintain, as the spare parts for the CPU may be harder to source. It’s ideal to select a product inspection equipment supplier with a reputation for short lead times on spare components to minimise downtime.

A machine fit for the future?
Also consider the flexibility of the product inspection system. Food safety standards are not static but rather constantly change to protect consumer wellbeing. It is important that the product inspection system can adapt to potential changes to industry guidelines without significant expenditure.

Look for product inspection systems capable of enhancing production line flexibility. Features such as easy-to-use HMIs with stored or variable product setup configurations can facilitate changeover of the processing line to new products, allowing you to respond more quickly to fluctuating market demand. Opt for metal detectors that make use of Variable Frequency Technology, which automatically selects the optimum detection frequency for the product to be inspected, overcoming the “product effect” or electrical signal created by wet or conductive products without compromising detection sensitivity. They can be set up for a potentially unlimited number of product changeovers, enabling you to process limited and seasonal product runs with productivity in mind.

Select product inspection systems from product inspection equipment suppliers that offer vision inspection and serialisation technology. This will enable you to adapt quickly to changes in food safety regulations that require traceability of products. Vision inspection systems are capable of examining information on pack labels, including pack weight, price and ingredient information and can track packs as they pass to the cartoning stage to palletisation to the transport that will take them to retailers. Such technology can enhance control over the production line, allowing you to demonstrate due diligence in the event of a product recall and protecting your brand’s reputation.

A reliable supplier?
Above all, it is vital you assess the reputation of your product inspection equipment partner before making the final decision regarding any new technology. A supplier known for quality and able to offer guidance at every stage will be best placed to help you find the most suitable solution for your needs.

Evaluate the service offering from the supplier. They should provide expert engineers to install and set up the new product inspection system as well as train line operatives. Suppliers with remote service support can monitor the performance of your equipment in real time, ensuring your product inspection system always operates at peak performance.

A strong and trusted supplier will act as a partner, ensuring your product inspection technology supports and enhances the performance of your processing line. This will not only help you comply with global food safety standards, it will enable you to enhance production efficiency, reduce product waste and save money.

A checklist for quality
Selecting your new product inspection system can be daunting. It is important to remember that your technology choice will determine not only whether you comply with regulations, but also whether you save money and protect your profit margins. When shopping around for your new processing line machinery, be sure to consult this checklist to help you calculate the benefit and potential costs to your production line.
###

About the author
Neil Giles is Marketing Communications Manager at the Mettler-Toledo Product Inspection Division of Mettler-Toledo, based in the UK. He currently specialises across all four main product inspection technologies, which are x-ray, metal detection, vision inspection, Pharmacontrol Electronic GmbH (PCE) and checkweighing. A member of the Chartered Institute of Marketing, he has over 20 years of experience in the food and pharmaceutical industries and has extensive knowledge of equipment for the packaging, process weighing and inspection sectors.

About Mettler-Toledo Product Inspection
Mettler-Toledo Safeline is the world’s leading supplier of metal detection and x-ray inspection solutions for the food and pharmaceutical industries. Together with Garvens Checkweighing, CI-Vision and Pharmacontrol Electronic GmbH (PCE), Mettler-Toledo Safeline forms the Product Inspection division of Mettler-Toledo.

Mettler-Toledo develops, produces and markets precision instruments worldwide. The company is one of the largest suppliers of weighing and quality control systems in the world, whose products are used in laboratories as well as industrial processing and food retailing applications. Renowned producers of all conceivable everyday products rely on Mettler-Toledo's technology as an important aid to delivering consistent product quality and innovative developments. These producers reap the benefits of the company's global presence and sales and service network.

Mettler-Toledo's corporate philosophy centres around high-quality standard and tailored solutions. The company forms a true partnership with its customers providing support during the selection of appropriate systems and working together to develop unique solutions which increase process efficiency, reduce overall manufacturing costs and improve competitiveness.

(The writer is Marketing and Communications Manager, Mettler-Toledo Product Inspection Division)

More needs to be done to curb climate-change effect on food yield: FAO

With the consequences of climate change for the world's food production systems becoming increasingly clear, more needs to be done to capitalise on agriculture's potential to mitigate global warming, says a new FAO (UN’s Food and Agriculture Organisation) Guidance Document—National Planning for GHG Mitigation in Agriculture—published on Tuesday.

Agriculture is directly responsible for over 10 per cent of all human-caused greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, FAO figures show. But improved farming practices offer the possibility of reducing those emissions and sequestering atmospheric carbon, while at the same time increasing the resilience of production systems, says the document, published by FAO's Mitigation of Climate Change in Agriculture Programme (MICCA).

Yet progress in drawing up agricultural GHG mitigation plans — as well as in allocating financing to climate change projects in the agriculture sector — is falling short of what is needed, cautions FAO.

The document aims to help address these shortfalls by providing step-wise advice and examples of national planning for GHG mitigation in food production systems, as well as highlighting opportunities for developing countries to secure climate financing for agriculture.

Examples from existing mitigation planning processes in developing countries illustrate options for addressing key planning elements in country-specific ways, and approaches to involving smallholder farmers in the planning process are highlighted as well.

Key steps, guiding principles

Although opportunities and planning processes will vary from country to country based on local circumstances, a number of general principals hold true, according to FAO.

First, mitigation actions in agriculture should be pursued within the context supporting agricultural development and food security, with planners clarifying from the start how mitigation can contribute to national development goals.

Participatory planning and cross-sectoral cooperation will be important to the success of mitigation plans, adds the report. Farmers and other stakeholders should be involved in setting objectives, actions and targets, both to generate support for and to improve the effectiveness of planned policies.

To access international and domestic financing, plans should be very specific regarding how to assess the mitigation potential of proposed policies and measures. Sound systems for measuring the impacts of policies and reporting other performance metrics are also necessary when seeking financing for projects.

Another key step is to identify the barriers that impede adoption of mitigation practices by farmers. Many agricultural practices that can mitigate climate change are already widely known — effective policies need to identify why farmers may not be adapting them, work to remove barriers, and facilitate their wider use.

Also crucial: determining how mitigation policies and measures will be financed.

Some countries are supporting agricultural mitigation activities primarily through domestic fiscal budget lines and policies that leverage private investment, the report notes. For many countries, however, an important goal of mitigation planning is to attract international financial support, in order to match the priorities of international climate finance institutions to specific parts of domestic mitigation plans.