Pages

7 Simple Rules for Effective and Hygienic Dry Goods Storage

For much of my professional career as a regulator, I never paid much attention to dry goods storage. As long as the foods were properly labeled, protected from overhead leakage and other contamination sources and the facility was maintained in a “broom clean” condition, obviously devoid of insect and rodent pests, it met the conditions of the regulations. Yes, I would cite the usual problems if they existed, pulling out the occasional damaged canned goods, asking for the removal of scoops left in dried ingredients with their handles encrusted with product from moisture and handling, and embargoing or ordering the destruction of insect and rodent-contaminated foods. Otherwise, I hardly gave any thought to space considerations and environmental conditions that favor ideal storage.

Then, several years ago, before the advent of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code and the wealth of information available on the Internet today, I came upon an un-insulated, corrugated metal-roofed storage facility at a Southern jail that gave me pause to think about storage practices in a new light. It was the middle of summer and the inside temperature registered well over 105°F. Although only dried and canned goods were stored within this room, it had an off-odor, best described as a bit rancid with undertones reminiscent of old musty books and mouse urine. It took about a day to sort through this facility and identify all of the questionable foods and those that were obviously no longer wholesome and remove them.

Shortly after this incident, I asked myself, “What makes an ideal dry goods storage facility?” I came up empty. The retail food regulations remained silent on this issue; there has been no change to date. The current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP) Part 110.93 offered some language concerning the safe storage of finished foods, referring to protection against deterioration, but it too is non-specific and leaves the interpretation open to the responsible party. Since that Southern storage facility experience, I’ve learned that seven simple rules can keep dry goods safe, wholesome and nutritious for as long as possible: rotate your stock; the cooler the better; the drier the better; don’t let the sun shine in, practice separation, best the pests, and size matters. To expand on these simple principles, consider the following:

Food Rotation
The best advice in the effective use of a dry goods storeroom is: rotate, rotate, rotate. Date all foods and food containers. Stored foods cannot get any better than what originally went in, but they can certainly get worse. The first food in should be the first food out: FIFO. It takes a bit of imagination and craft to position foods within a storeroom to best implement this principle. Keep a handy and readily visible record of the “use by” and “sell by” dates of the received foods and the shelf life in general.

Temperature
Keep storerooms cool, dry and well ventilated. The temperature should be between 50°F and 70°F. The cooler, the better. Temperature has more to do with how long well-dried foods store than anything else. The storage lives of most foods are cut in half by every increase of 18°F (10°C). There is probably a limit as to how far this statement can be taken, but a reasonable expectation of shelf life may be extrapolated from room temperature down to freezing. No doubt, the inverse could also be considered true. Cool storage reduces respiratory activity and the degradation of enzymes; it reduces internal water loss and inhibits the growth of decay producing organisms, and in some foods such as fruits and root crops, it slows the production of ethylene, a naturally occurring ripening agent.

As part of maintaining optimal temperature, it is suggested that adequate ventilation should be provided (some air exchange rate is absolutely essential). In addition, the storeroom should be free of un-insulated steam and water pipes, water heaters, transformers, refrigeration condensing units, steam generators or other heat producing equipment.

Humidity
Ideally, storage areas should have a humidity level of 15% or less. Unless the storeroom is located in the desert, consider air conditioning or dehumidification during the most humid times of the year. A second option is to use moisture impervious packaging. Ideally, there is no reason not to use both.

Maintain stored foods in their original packages whenever possible. Most packaging is designed for the food it contains and will remain in good condition for their given shelf-life in the absence of temperature and humidity abuse. For instance, the cardboard box will help cushion jars and other glass containers from breakage. If original packaging is not practical, maintain the food in airtight containers, primarily to prevent the entry of insect and rodent pests and keep out other contaminants. To take this to another level, consider oxygen as a major threat to the quality of food. The chances are that moisture-proof packaging is also airtight. The less head gas (<2% O2) in a package, the longer its shelf life is maintained.

Sunlight
Avoid storing foods in direct sunlight. Sunlight promotes oxidation and the subsequent loss of the food’s nutritional value and quality. Fat-soluble vitamins, such as A, D, E and K are particularly sensitive to light degradation. It is far better to block sunlight on windows and skylights and rely on artificial illumination for the time the storeroom is in use.

Storage for Risk Reduction
Store dry foods at least six inches off the floor and at least 18 inches away from outer walls to reduce the chances of condensation brought on by temperature differences between the container and the surface against which it rests, as well as to facilitate cleaning and pest control activities. In the absence of rapid turnover of bulk palletized storage, consider placing the clean pallets on racks or blocks at least four inches (six inches is preferable) off the floor. This seemingly insignificant procedure goes a long way in preventing the harborage of pestilence, particularly rodents. It is also suggested that a 2-ft. ceiling clearance be maintained to avoid high temperatures at the ceiling.

Set aside an area that is designated for damaged or rework products. Torn containers should be taped or otherwise secured to prevent entry of contaminants and prevent further spillage. As a side note: There is a fine line between Class II (Potential Public Health Hazard) and Class III (Aesthetic Defects) in cans. It is for this reason, I ask all my clients to separate for credit any noticeable damage that is not identified when the goods are received, as well as for some boxed and/or bagged foods. If this practice is followed, a little more space is needed in the set-aside area.

If any way possible, do not store economic poisons, cleaning supplies and other non-food items in the same storeroom as food without some physical barrier that separate the two. I am also a strong proponent of storing look-alike condiments and other ingredients, such as salt and sugar, in spatially separate locations within a storeroom to avoid interchanging these products.

Vermin
To prevent the entry of insects, rodents and birds into the storeroom, doors and windows should be rodent and insect-proofed and kept closed whenever possible. Any opening to the outside should be sealed and all structural cracks and crevices promptly repaired. Bait boxes, if needed, should be regularly monitored and any damaged bait boxes and spilled bait should be carefully cleaned up and removed. If fumigation is absolutely essential, rely only on experienced licensed control operators.

Along these lines, the exterior of the building in which the storeroom is located should be maintained free of fire hazards, pest infestations and to preclude any security problems.

Size
Finally, we come to size of the dry good storeroom. As with all storage considerations: size matters. Since the 1970s, we have seen an almost geometric increase in single-use disposable products, including prepackaged ready-to-eat (RTE) foods, food utensils, cookware, housekeeping equipment and supplies, various paper goods, gloves and other personal hygiene packaging, waste containers—and the list goes on and on. Economy bulk purchasing of nonperishable items, items procured by consumer expectations and demand and the changing marketplace of how retail food is structured has dramatically changed the need for storage space. For instance, three decades ago, we used 0.1 cu. ft as the standard size of a meal. Today, without an increase in the quantity of food, the average meal is anywhere from 0.25 to 0.5 cu. ft or higher.

This increase in volume often has not been reflected in the design of many newer food establishments, including formula facilities. For this reason, I would like to refer you to one of the few readily accessible references for dry goods storage criteria: the FDA and Conference for Food Protection’s Food Establishment Plan Review Guide. Jim Anderton, who spearheads that section at the FDA, has done yeoman work in providing easy-to-use graphs and tables to complete the necessary space and storage calculations. To get you started in either new design or in revamping an existing facility to meet today’s needs, let me introduce you to Section III of the Food Establishment Guide for Design, Installation, and Construction Recommendations: Part 7, Dry Good Storage, which states the storage space of a food establishment is determined by the menu, number of meals served, quantities of food purchased and the frequency of delivery. The plan review guide suggests that food establishments use the following formula to estimate required storage space:
Required storage area (sq. ft.) = Volume per meal x number of meals between deliveries
Average height x fraction of usable storeroom floor area
Where: the volume per meal equals .025 to .050 cu. ft. per meal served; useful storeroom height equals 4 to 7 ft.; storage time between deliveries equals 3 to 14 days; and fraction of usable storeroom floor area is .3 to .6. Depending on the menu and type of food establishment, I might suggest a higher volume of 0.75 to 1.0 cu. ft. is considered with respect to cubic feet per meals served.

The guideline suggests that shelving can be constructed of suitably finished hard wood, durable plastic or preferably of corrosion resistant metal. It goes on to recommend that the highest shelf for practical use should be 7 ft. and the lowest should be 6 inches from the floor. Clearance between the shelves should be at least 15 inches. To calculate the total shelving needed, the following formula is applied, where D = depth of the shelves in feet; H = clearance between shelves in feet ; and C = 80% effective capacity of shelf height:
Linear feet of shelving for storage (ft.) = Volume per meal x number of meals between deliveries
D x H x C

Food Safety Education Month

September is National Food Safety Education Month. It provides an opportunity to raise awareness about steps you can take to prevent foodborne illness.

Every year, an estimated one in six Americans (or 48 million people) get sick, 128,000 are hospitalized and 3,000 die of foodborne diseases.

Read the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) new feature, also available in Spanish, to learn why this is especially important for the following groups of people: children under age 5, adults age 65 and older, people with weak immune systems, and pregnant women.

Join CDC in sharing social media with graphics about which groups of people are more likely to get food poisoning and what steps they or their caregivers can take to help prevent it.

FDA Delays Water Testing Compliance

FDA recognizes a need for expanded efforts to educate growers and state officials on the new produce safety requirements. Towards that end, the agency will continue its focus on training, guidance development, and outreach over the next year.

For produce farm inspections, large farming operations will still be expected to meet all requirements set by the Produce Safety rule for produce other than sprouts, except those related to agricultural water, by the original January 26, 2018, compliance date.

Inspections to assess compliance with the non-water requirements of the Produce Safety rule for produce other than sprouts won’t start until 2019.

FDA and state partners will use the year to give more education, training, and outreach to growers on the new requirements. States will expand On-Farm Readiness Reviews in the months ahead. The reviews have been piloted in six states and allow growers to receive an assessment of their readiness to meet the new FSMA requirements.

For agricultural water compliance dates, FDA issued a proposed rule that would extend the compliance dates for the agricultural water requirements by an additional two to four years for produce other than sprouts.

The extension will allow the FDA to “take another look” at the water standards to ensure that they are feasible for farmers in all regions of the country and still protect public health, according to the release.

The new agricultural water compliance date that FDA is proposing for the largest farms is January 2022. Small farms and very small farms would have until January 2023 and January 2024, respectively. The proposed rule is open for public comment for 60 days.

The agency said it does not intend to take action to enforce the agricultural water requirements for produce other than sprouts while the rulemaking to extend the compliance dates is underway.

Sprouts, because of their unique vulnerability to contamination, remain subject to applicable agricultural water requirements in the final rule and their original compliance dates.

FDA plans to talk with farmers, state regulatory partners and others about how water is used in agriculture. That outreach will include an agriculture water summit early next year, according to the release.

FDA also announced eight additional water testing methods that can be used for meeting the requirements of the Produce Safety rule. The agency said it intends to add other methods to the list as they are identified.

FSSAI, NADA ink pact to ensure dope-free nutrition supplements

Concerned over doping cases in sportspersons, the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) and the National Anti Doping Agency (NADA) today signed an agreement to put in place a system to ensure dope- free sports nutrition supplements are sold in the market.
At present, the NADA conducts test on human beings for doping, but there is no mechanism in place to test ‘doping substance’ in nutrition supplements that are consumed both by sportspersons and fitness enthusiasts. "Doping has been a major concern with us.
When we analysed the cases, we found many of the athletes involved in doping were on account of nutrition supplements. We took up with the FSSAI to address the issue," NADA Director General and CEO Navin Agarwal told reporters after the signing of the agreement.
The NADA chief added: "This holistic effort aims to provide an ecosystem of safe food for sports professionals across the country. It is one of the significant steps for NADA to ensure healthy and safe supplements for competing athletes." Sportspersons are in a dilemma as to which dietary supplement to use.
"Many of them, instead of developing their stamina and physique, end up in doping violation," he said. It is a major public health issue for citizens as well because many of the supplements available in the open market near gyms contain some of the dope substances that are harmful for long-term health of an individual, he said.
The need of the hour is to put in place "some sort of facility" to ensure sportspersons do not inadvertently end up doping through supplements. Highlighting the key work areas to be undertaken as per the memorandum of agreement (MoU), FSSAI CEO Pawan Agarwal said a working group of scientific committee will be set up that will give guidance for setting standards for manufacturers and importers of these products and method of testing doping substance in nutrition supplements.
"NADA labs do testing on humans for doping not on substances. As far as doping substances is concerned, the capacity of our labs has to be built to do the testing," he said, adding that the NADA will help in capacity building of FSSAI-accredited testing labs as well as the regulatory staff.
According to the FSSAI chief, the move will ensure food safety ecosystem in sports nutrition becomes more robust over time. The two bodies will also work together to come out with guidance on labelling with instructions on using supplements and printing ‘dope-free’, he said. "We are also looking at international experiences. We do not find provisions for labelling requirement for doping substances.
There are some voluntary efforts around the world, but we are going to study them," the FSSAI chief said. The issues related to surveillance and enforcement as also creating awareness about safe and judicious use of nutrition supplements will also be studied, he added.
The MoU signed with the FSSAI is valid for five years. The NADA has recently inked similar agreement with a drug regulator. Despite 300 doped substances banned globally, nearly 10 of them like Diuretics and Hormones are most widely used.

FSSAI targets supplements, looks to curb doping in sports

Food regulator FSSAI will bring in rules on the presence of doping substances in food and nutritional supplements that are usually sold off the shelf
‘We have formed a working committee consisting of experts from relevant industries for technical assistance,’ FSSAI CEO Pawan Kumar Agarwal has said. Photo: Pradeep Gaur/Mint
New Delhi: The country’s food regulator now wants to curb the use of prohibited performance-enhancing substances by sports professionals through nutritional supplements.
Over the next few months, the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) will bring in regulations on the presence of doping substances in food and nutritional supplements that are usually sold off the shelf. Companies will have to follow specific labelling norms for selling food and nutritional supplements. Both domestically produced products and imported supplements will come under the FSSAI regime.
FSSAI, which signed a five-year agreement with National Anti-Doping Agency (NADA) on Thursday, will develop capacities at its laboratories to test for the presence of restricted or prohibited substances in food and nutritional supplements.
At present, FSSAI laboratories do not have either the expertise or the capacity for this. NADA, however, does.
“We have formed a working committee consisting of experts from relevant industries for technical assistance. A draft regulation will be discussed in the next meeting on 21 September,” said Pawan Kumar Agarwal, chief executive officer, FSSAI.
Besides FSSAI’s own team, the committee will have representatives from NADA, Sports Authority of India (SAI) and Narcotics Control Bureau, among others. FSSAI is also in the process of constituting a team for surveillance and enforcement of regulations. “As part of awareness development among consumers, we’ll also bring a special usage guide. Most of the doping is done without knowledge and they have ill-effects in the long term,” Agarwal added.
FSSAI and NADA held a series of meetings on the subject of doping in the last few months after the latter requested the food regulator to frame standards and regulations. “Doping is a menace we need to stop. With FSSAI, we’ll try to ensure availability of safe supplements for competing athletes, among others. There are about 300 substances that are prohibited globally. Of these, about 10 such as steroids, are commonly used,” said Navin Aggarwal, CEO and director general, NADA.
Last year, FSSAI notified standards for health supplements, nutraceuticals, foods for special dietary use, foods for special medical purposes, functional foods and novel foods. According to the notification, these foods should “consist of a composition delivering the desired level of energy, proteins, vitamins and minerals, and other essential nutrients required for the respective age group, gender and physiological stage in accordance with the guidelines made by the Indian Council of Medical Research”.
The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), in its doping violation report for 2015, ranked India third after the Russian Federation and Italy. In 2015, 117 athletes failed to clear dope tests.
The Indian government had, in 2013, drafted the National Sports Development Bill that highlighted elimination of doping practices. As per a 27 April report in the Indian Express, the government has been working on a new legislation to make doping by athletes a criminal offence and the proposed law could include coaches, manufacturers and suppliers of these products.

India likely to ban cheap Pepper imports siting quality concerns

For the past few months Cheap Pepper imports from Vietnam has been causing problems in India, as decline in domestic prices being the main problem. Now the Spices board has recommended a ban on imports of Pepper siting quality concerns.
Pepper prices in India has declined to about Rs 400 per kg from Rs 650 per kg about a year ago, on the back of cheap imports from Vietnam through Sri lanka. The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) has put the Vietnamese Pepper under the scanner for suspected contamination.
Three months ago, the Multi Commodity Exchange (MCX), expecting to bring some stability in prices launched trading in Malabar Garbled Black Pepper futures contract, but due to the cheap import it did not get the desired result.
It is estimated that Vietnam has exported about 3000 tons of Pepper to Sri Lanka during July and another 2000 tons in August and from that a majority share has arrived in India. Import from Sri Lanka carries a duty of 8 percent under the SAARC agreement, compared with 70 percent from other countries.

Fungal Infection on imported wheat: Food safety nod must for distribution, Says Kerala HC



KOCHI: Imported wheat that was found to have fungal infection should not be distributed without the approval of food safety commissioner, the Kerala high court has ordered.
While issuing the directive, a division bench led by the chief justice said it is not possible to compromise in the matter of food safety and health. The court was considering an appeal filed by the state government regarding release of wheat imported by a private firm that was seized upon finding that it is not fit for use.
Kozhikode-based PK Roller Flour Mills had imported 20,000 tonnes of wheat from Ukraine through Kochi port in December last year. Food safety department had seized the wheat alleging that the wheat had fungal infection and is old.
Challenging the food safety department’s action at the high court, the company had alleged that the wheat can be used after washing and drying it. A single bench had allowed for inspecting 20 tonnes of the wheat stored at a warehouse of the port after washing it. The company then sought a directive to shift the wheat to Kozhikode for washing. The court allowed such action to be carried out in the presence of an advocate commissioner.
During the hearing on the appeal filed by the food safety commissioner, state government contended that the wheat is not fit for human consumption and distribution of the wheat would create health problems.

This Delhi Man Found Insects & Bugs In Domino’s Oregano Sachets



We all like to have days when we can kick back and relax with a chilled beverage and a pizza. Cooking seems like such a task these days and we’d rather spend that time watching TV or having a conversation. The pizza arrives and our gut instinct is to reach out for the packets that contain chilli flakes and oregano, and many of us sprinkle them all over our pizza without a second thought. They’re only condiments, right? Well, you may want to look closely from now on, for this man found insects in Dominos pizza oregano packets and he’s uploaded a revolting video on social media as proof.
Insects In Dominos Pizza Packets
Delhi’s Rahul Arora had ordered a pizza like any other person on Friday evening and fell ill the morning after. He happened to notice tiny insects moving around in the oregano sachets and even uploaded a video where he opens a completely sealed packet pours out the contents into a small steel bowl. You can immediately see the tiny brown insects scurrying away.
Domino’s has replied to Arora’s tweet saying that they follow strict procedures and that they’d want to investigate the matter with him over a private conversation. The sachets even have the FSSAI accreditation on them. In which case, we wonder whether brands really adhere to the rules and regulations that FSSAI has put into place when they package anything.
Rahul Arora later got a call from Domino’s offering to replace his order. But, he told them off by saying that the issue is not a home delivery complaint and that the illness was caused due to the consumption of contaminated food. It’s wrong to trivialise such a thing.
He has also registered a complaint with the Department of Consumer Affairs and is waiting for a response. As quoted to NDTV, he said that “I wonder what would have happened if this happened in the US,” and that “The chalta hai attitude towards Indian consumers should end.”
Now, we understand that Domino’s probably doesn’t package its own oregano, and it probably has outsourced this to another company that prints and packages the herbs under the name of the brand. This does lead us to think whether the source goes through quality check from time to time.
Update
Since the video and Arora’s story went viral over the internet, Domino’s has released a statement that says, “This is with respect to a Consumer Complaint received on 11th September 2017 regarding oregano sachets, supplied by one of our vendors, in an outlet in Gurugram. The Company has since carried out a comprehensive inspection across vendors & stores and would like to reassure that all our food ingredients are safe for consumption and we have not received any other complaint of this nature.”
“Jubilant FoodWorks maintains stringent hygiene and quality standards for its products. All the vendors and manufacturing units are FSMS (food safety management systems) certified. We also have Hazard & Critical Control Points (HACCP) certified (globally accepted standard for quality certification) commissaries where we follow strict quality standards and have a regular Audit process of all ingredients used.”
“Jubilant FoodWorks values its consumer’s experience and would like to reassure all its Consumers about best quality products, service and a great Domino’s experience at all times.”