Pages

Gutka companies get a kick by subverting the ban



Companies sell tobacco-less pan masala and tobacco separately, claiming that chewable tobacco is not a food product.
They are selling tobacco-less pan masala and sachets of tobacco separately
While gutka in its known form may be banned, its seemingly legal derivatives are still freely available. A multitude of colourful sachets hang in shops, and business is usual for shopkeepers. Although, the only difference though is that for a gutka-like kick one needs to buy multiple products. “We no longer supply gutka. But you can mix these two,” said a shopkeeper in Assaigoli on the outskirts of the city, pointing to two different coloured sachets.
Though the government has banned the sale and making of gutka and pan masala that contain tobacco or nicotine under the Food Safety and Standards (Prohibition and Restrictions on Sales) Regulations, 2011, on May 31, companies subvert the ban by selling tobacco-less pan masala and sachets of tobacco separately.
For Rs. 2, customers buy pan masala (with no tobacco, no nicotine printed clearly) and a small sachet of tobacco. Contents of the two are crushed between the palms, mixed well and then chewed. “The taste is terrible. But you get used to it,” said an autorickshaw driver, who was buying two such sachets in Bendoorwell here.
Though the sale of products such as these has reduced by half since the ban, Chandra, a shopkeeper in Marnamikatte, said many resorted to buying tobacco separately. “At least 40 per cent of the customers buy sachets of pan masala and chewing tobacco… The ban is not effective unless chewing tobacco itself is banned.”
The sale of chewable tobacco exploits a loophole in the wording of the Section 2.3.4 of the Regulation, which prohibits addition of tobacco to food, said Vishal Rao, Director, Cancer Prevention and Tobacco Control Project, Institute of Public Health, Bangalore.
“This is a billion dollar industry that is looking at all the ways to flout the law. They claim chewable tobacco is not a food product. This is a technicality, and States are still waiting for a Supreme Court clarification on this,” he said.
He said creating multiple names – Chaini, Zarda, among others – instead of labelling it as gutka was another way to create an “atmosphere of confusion” to circumvent the ban.
While claiming that gutka is not freely available in the district, B.V. Rajesh, Food Safety Officer, said that without a government order, they could not stop the sale of either pan masala or chewable tobacco.

Assam govt, CII to form joint Task Force with food processing on agenda

Assam government will be partnering with CII for overall economic development of the state and to facilitate initiatives that will catalyse grassroots level development. This was revealed by S Gopalakrishnan, president, CII (Confederation of Indian Industry), and co-founder & executive VC, Infosys Ltd, while on a visit to the state recently.

In this regard, the state government and CII will constitute a joint Task Force to work on a 5-point agenda for development of the region. The agenda will include boosting food processing including enabling the tea industry to move up the value chain, initiating skill development and growth of the IT industry, enhancing MSME competitiveness through capacity building, and facilitating healthcare delivery.

To enhance the competitiveness of the MSME sector in the state, CII through its Centre of Excellence for Competitiveness will work with the state government for cluster development programmes in the state. This would be done for the companies operating out of Industrial estates in a phased manner.

FAO launches e-books with food, agriculture, hunger eradication titles

FAO has launched its first e-books, featuring best-selling titles from the world of food, agriculture and hunger eradication.

For now, the first titles are available for free download in formats compatible with major e-readers and tablets (iPad, Kindle, Kobo, Nook, Sony Reader and others) at FAO’s (UN’s Food and Agriculture Organisation) publications page.

More free publications will be uploaded during a pilot phase that will continue until later this year. Eventually, the books will be available from e-book stores.

"Offering selected titles in the increasingly popular e-book format is an important step forward," said Rachel Tucker, FAO acting publishing chief. "FAO's wealth of information on food, agriculture and hunger eradication will now be available in a format requested by a growing number of our audiences."

FAO's first e-books are available in English with other languages to follow.

Review by EFSA concludes diet is major source for BPA; Feedback sought

EFSA’s scientific experts have provisionally concluded that for all population groups diet is the major source of exposure to bisphenol A (BPA) and exposure is lower than previously estimated by EFSA (European Food Safety Authority).

According to a press note issued by EFSA on Thursday, BPA is a chemical compound used in food contact materials such as packaging as well as in other consumer products.
This is the Authority’s first review of exposure to BPA since 2006 and the first to cover both dietary and non-dietary sources (including thermal paper and environmental sources such as air and dust).
As part of a two-stage process of its full risk assessment, EFSA is now seeking feedback on this draft assessment of consumer exposure to BPA. During a later phase, EFSA will publicly consult on the second part of its draft opinion, focussing on its assessment of the potential human health risks of BPA.
New data resulting from an EFSA call for data led to a considerable refinement of exposure estimates compared to 2006. For infants and toddlers (aged 6 months-3 years) average exposure from the diet is estimated to amount to 375 nanogram per kilogram of body weight per day (ng/kg bw/day) whereas for the population above 18 years of age (including women of child-bearing age) the figure is up to 132 ng/kg bw/day. By comparison, these estimates are less than 1% of the current Tolerable Daily Intake (TDI) for BPA (0.05 milligram/kg bw/day) established by EFSA in 2006.
For all population groups above three years of age thermal paper was the second most important source of BPA after the diet (potentially accounting for up to 15% of total exposure in some population groups).
Among other key findings, scientists found dietary exposure to BPA to be the highest among children aged three to 10 (explainable by their higher food consumption on a body weight basis). Canned food and non-canned meat and meat products were identified as major contributors to dietary BPA exposure for all age groups.
Scientific approach
To derive these exposure estimates, experts on EFSA’s Scientific Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids (CEF Panel) applied two approaches: exposure modelling and analysis of human biomonitoring data (from urine samples).
•    Exposure modelling involves the assessment of exposure to BPA through food and non-food sources (thermal paper, air, dust, toys, cosmetics, dental sealants) and routes (diet, inhalation and skin contact) in the EU population. This method allows for the estimation of exposure from all sources, which could be identified and quantified individually.
•    Urinary biomonitoring data (that is, levels of BPA found in the urine) were used to corroborate the Panel’s estimates of overall BPA exposure and to ensure no major source of exposure was missed.
The Panel’s draft opinion includes analysis of possible uncertainties in the exposure assessment. The estimates of dietary exposure based on the data on occurrence of BPA in food and EFSA’s Comprehensive European Food Consumption Database are considered robust. However, there are uncertainties regarding exposure from thermal paper and more data are needed especially related to BPA skin absorption and cash receipt handling habits in order to provide a refined estimate of exposure through this source.

Public consultation and ongoing work
All stakeholders and interested parties will be able to provide their comments on the draft exposure assessment from July 25 to September 15, 2013. EFSA decided on a two-stage public consultation in the interests of transparency and in line with the Authority’s willingness to consult with all stakeholders before conclusion of its full risk assessment.

Online food licensing and regn faces manpower & infrastructure hurdles

Even technology has failed to speed up the snail-paced licensing and registration of FBOs procedure being undertaken across the country under the Food Safety & Standards (Licensing and Registration of Food Businesses) Regulations, 2011.

That is because, fraught with glitches like lack of tech-savvy users and officials and inadequate infrastructure – software, hardware and manpower - the online version of the procedure, which meant the entire process will be completed in a few minutes at the click of a few buttons, has failed to gather steam in most parts of the country where it has been launched in recent times.

While the above-mentioned glitches are a matter of grave concern for now, they are also likely to impact the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India’s (FSSAI) goal of completing the licensing and registration procedure in the country before the deadline – February 4, 2014 – be it manual or online. Interestingly, the deadline has been extended by the Authority twice earlier.

To know the current scenario, let us take a look at Goa. The tiny state commenced the process of licensing and registration online on January 31, 2012. Jyoti J Sardessai, deputy director, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the South Goa district, said, “Most food business operators across the state prefer offline application.”

This was confirmed by a source in the district FDA, who added that online licensing and registration constitutes 30 per cent, while offline licensing and registration accounts for the remainder.

He said, “Adequate infrastructure has not been created for citizen-centric centres (for instance, cyber-cafes, which charge exorbitant rates). Another hurdle the online system faces in Goa is that most FBOs are not too tech-savvy.”

“We have recently appointed four data entry operators, who upload the information about applications received – both online and offline – from FBOs in the state's two districts (North Goa and South Goa) onto a database,” the official informed.

“Establishments with larger premises and more staff opt for online licensing and registration,” he added.

Software glitches

The online licensing and registration process first started about two years ago. But the software for the same, though developed with a great deal of fanfare and trials, was not upto the mark. While efforts were made to rectify the weak areas, users still found some glitches.

Maharashtra

Maharashtra was the first to start the online licensing and registration. Till date, 3 lakh FBOs across the western state have either registered or obtained licences. Yet, 90 per cent of the registration and licensing has taken place offline, and the remainder online.

Haryana & Chandigarh

Haryana also started the online registration for FBOs on March 22 2013. Chandigarh, the capital of the state (as well as that of Punjab), became the first Union Territory recently to introduce the online food licensing and registration system (FLRS) to facilitate food business operators (FBOs) to file and track their applications.

Tamil Nadu & Kerala

The total number of licenses issued by and FBOs registered in Tamil Nadu so far is 1,85,000, all of which are offline. The online process recently commenced in Madurai district. The number of FBOs who have either obtained a license or registered – all offline – across Kerala is 55,000.

Gujarat – An exception

However, Gujarat is a state whose Food and Drug Control Administration (FDCA) has fared better than its counterparts in the other states.

H G Koshia, the state's food commissioner, said, “About 1,20,000 FBOs have either obtained a license or registered offline so far. And I am proud to say that Gujarat has become the first state in the country to start the online registration and licensing process in all 26 districts at one go.”

He added, “We imparted training to all the FBOs and also organised five workshops covering all the districts along with the National Institute for Smart Government (NISG) and the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI).”

Koshia added, “I am sure Gujarat will complete its licensing and registration well before the deadline stipulated by the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India, namely February 4, 2014.”

Puducherry's poor performance

“There are seven months to go before the February 4, 2014 deadline lapses, but the process of licensing and registration is yet to commence in Puducherry,” said Ragesh Chandra, the Union Territory's health and education secretary.

Conclusion

Nevertheless, FSSAI is organising workshops and educating FBOS across the country hoping that all the states concerned come up with solutions for their problems soon.