The author throws light on some grim details about
the cow in India, the world’s largest producer of milk.
You know that child who
throws a terrible tantrum over a glass of milk. How he kicks and screams and
refuses to touch the stuff? Haven’t you wondered what the fuss is all about?
After all, it’s just a glass of milk.
It
turns out the child may just have the right idea. The business of producing
milk — indeed, the multi-crore rupee cattle industry it’s a part of — is
sustained by a process of relentless cruelty towards animals, from birth till
death, with little letup. Cruelty compounded by poorly defined, poorly
implemented methods and gross violations.
In 1998, India, hitherto a milk-deficient
nation, surpassed the U.S. as the highest milk-producing nation, a position it
holds till date. According to the Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and
Fisheries, the government has invested Rs. 2242 crore to help meet a national
demand of 150 million tonnes of milk by 2016-17. Millions of cattle will be
produced (mainly through artificial insemination) for this purpose.
This
will be done through “productivity enhancement, strengthening and expanding
village-level infrastructure for milk procurement and providing producers with
greater access to markets. The strategy involves improving genetic potential of
bovines, producing required number of quality bulls, and superior quality
frozen semen and adopting adequate bio-security measures etc.” Today India is
home to the world’s largest cattle herd, with 324 million head.
The government is positioning this as a
food security measure for the future. From the point of view of the animals,
though, unthinkable cruelty lies ahead.
That image of tender care and worship that
we are raised with, the image that is propagated in films and integrated with
our cultural values — that’s a myth. In reality, the life of a cow in India is
a horror show.
The first three stages of life — birth,
maturity and motherhood — happen with inhuman haste. The female calf is born.
She reaches puberty somewhere between 15 months and three years of age,
depending on the breed, and is then impregnated, increasingly through
artificial insemination.
Arpan Sharma, external relations in-charge
at the Federation of Indian Animal Protection Organisations, builds
partnerships for better protection of animals by bringing together various
stakeholders such as industry, government and regulators. He says, “Due to poor
equipment and a lack of proper training, artificially inseminated cows
sometimes become infertile and develop infections with few to care for them.”
Soon,
the calf is born. While the cow is seen as a metaphor for motherhood, she is
rarely given a chance to experience its joys for very long. Calves are
separated from their mothers soon after they are born so that they don’t drink
up all the milk. Just what does this do to these docile creatures?
The American physician Dr. Michael Klaper,
the author of books such as Vegan
Nutrition: Pure and Simple and Pregnancy, Children, and the
Vegan Diet, provides an insight. “On the second day after birth, my uncle
took the calf from the mother and placed him in the veal pen in the barn — only
10 yards away, in plain view of the mother. The mother cow could see her
infant, smell him, hear him, but could not touch him, comfort him, or nurse
him. The heartrending bellows that she poured forth — minute after minute, hour
after hour, for five long days — were excruciating to listen to. They are the
most poignant and painful auditory memories I carry in my brain,” he said in a
2010 interview with the Northwest Veg, a non-profit organisation based in
Portland, Oregon.
Eileen Weintraub of Help Animals India and
Vishakha Society for Protection and Care of Animals, Vishakhapatnam, takes this
fact to its logical extreme. She states firmly, “With 1.2 billion people and
400 million vegetarians, anyone who does not have a vegan diet contributes to
the suffering of cows.”
***
I
once asked my mother, “If we take milk from cows, then what does the calf
drink?” She said the milk a cow produces is more than the calf requires, and
humans use what’s left over.
Apparently not. “The quantity of milk a
calf gets varies. By and large, unless the calf is what is called “replacement
stock,” it will get only the bare minimum necessary for survival. Often it will
not even get that,” says Sharma.
To
increase yield, the cows are also injected with Oxytocin, a hormone banned in
India under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act and section 12 of Food and
Drug Adulteration Prevention Act, 1960. “Studies around the world show that
cows injected with Oxytocin have a greater incidence of abortions, mastitis and
lower conception rates, and their calves suffer higher than normal infant
mortality and delayed puberty,” says Erika Abrams, founder of Animal Aid
Unlimited, an animal rescue organisation based in Udaipur.
And what happens to unwanted male calves?
This is where we wade into the red zone of this bloody business. “Milk cows
need to produce a calf every year and half those calves are male. While a
fraction of these are used to pull ploughs, others are butchered. Their skin is
used for leather, and their meat for local consumption and export,” says
Abrams. Calf leather comes from male calves of which India has a huge number.
The ones that live don’t fare much better.
With traditional backyard agriculture slowly giving way to ‘intensive dairy
farming’, hundreds of cows are confined for long periods within cramped, dark
and acrid quarters. “More times than not even where there is a lot of space they
are tied with a two-foot rope and in most cases all they can do is sit down and
stand up even if they are in the open,” says Nandita Shah, Director at Sharan,
Sanctuary for Health and Reconnection to Animals and Nature, Pondicherry. “At
some places in Mumbai, calves are tied outside till they die of starvation; so
technically they have not been killed.”
Divya
Narain, an animal rescue volunteer from Bhopal, says, “At the State-run animal
shelter in Bhopal, we often get recumbent little male calves, which have been
dumped on the streets to die.” In other words, male calves, more or less,
suffer an early death.
And what about cows? Cows and buffaloes can
be productive until about the age of 14 years. But in the existing set up, in
which cows are kept pregnant for almost 300 days a year, most of them dry up by
the age of five or six. And after spending most of her life being milked,
enduring hormone injections and the trauma of separation, the cow is sent off
to the slaughterhouse.
Twenty-eight
Indian states have cow-slaughter protection legislations in place. Unproductive
cows, therefore, are routinely trafficked to slaughterhouses in the states
where laws are less stringent or non-existent — Arunachal Pradesh, Meghalaya,
Mizoram, Nagaland, Tripura, Lakshadweep, and especially Kerala. A large number
of cattle is trafficked to Kerala, under inhuman conditions, from the
neighbouring states as it is a major consumer of beef and does not have any
regulation pertaining to cow slaughter. Apuroopa Podhardha, the legal adviser
of People for Cattle in India (PFCI), a Chennai-based animal rescue group,
says, “Thirty animals are crammed into a truck meant for six. In some
instances, the legs of calves are tied and they are dumped in one on top of the
other. Furthermore, no provision for food or water is made”. Cattle are also
trafficked to West Bengal, from where they are taken to Bangladesh.
PFCI has conducted three cow-rescue
operations in Chennai. Podhardha’s colleague Arun Prasanna G. says, “The latest
delicacy in demand in the Middle Eastern markets is veal (the meat of a calf no
older than three months). Flesh of unborn calves is known to bear medicinal
value hence pregnant cattle are slaughtered.”
Prasanna
says, “In many slaughterhouses, the act of slaughtering involves smashing the
head of a cow with a sledgehammer, which renders it unconscious; then skinning
it; and or hanging it upside down so that all the blood can be drained from the
slit jugular vein, then skinning it live.” In a recent raid in an illegal slaughterhouse
in Chennai recently, there were 20 cattle. “We could only rescue six of them.
The police insisted we file a complaint first, which gave the cattle owners
time to hide the remaining cows.” The slaughterhouse owners received an
anticipatory bail.
***
According
to the Ministry of Food Processing Industries, India has 3,600 slaughterhouses,
nine modern abattoirs and 171 meat-processing units licensed under the meat
products order. These do not include the numerous and ever-growing number of
illegal and unregulated slaughterhouses, estimated to be more than 30,000.
According to the U.S Department of Agriculture’s report on Livestock and
Poultry: World Markets and Trade, India became the biggest beef exporter in the
world in 2012(till October) with 16,80,000 tonnes of beef and veal exports,
followed by Brazil with 13,94,000 metric tonnes and Australia with 13,80,000
metric tonnes of exports. In 2013, India’s beef exports are forecast 29 per
cent higher to a record 2.16 million tonnes, accounting for nearly a quarter of
world trade.
“The
government gives subsidies to slaughterhouses because beef exports are a gold
mine,” says Prasanna. A US beef export federation study states India exported
$1.24 billion worth of meat in the first half of 2012. According to Tamil Nadu
Veterinary and Animals Sciences authorities 1.4 million tonnes of cattle were
legally slaughtered in 2012 nationwide.
“One dead animal is worth approximately Rs.
30,000. Tissues from a cattle’s heart are used to rebuild livers. Horns and
hoofs are used to make buttons, skin is used for leather, flesh for meat, tail
is used for fertility treatment, bones are used for whitening sugar, and
producing gelatin,” says Prasanna.
In states such as Madhya Pradesh, where cow
slaughter is illegal, trafficking is rife, and the dry cattle that are not
transported are let loose on the streets, where they live the last days of
their lives foraging in dustbins, eating plastic-infested garbage and drinking
polluted water from open drains.
The
government runs several goshalas, shelters for old cattle, across
the country, but these are too few and are not governed by serious norms. Suma
R. Nayak, an advocate and a trustee of the Animal Care Trust, Mangalore, says, “Goshalas have started to operate
along the lines of dairy farms; only accepting healthy, productive cows.”
For all this, milk may not even be as rich
in calcium as we have been led to believe. Amy Lanou, Ph.D., Nutrition Director
for the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine in Washington, D.C.,
says, “The countries with the highest rates of osteoporosis are the ones where
people drink the most milk and have the most calcium in their diets. The
connection between calcium consumption and bone health is actually very weak,
and the connection between dairy consumption and bone health is almost
non-existent.”
Also, the growing numbers of cattle casts a
heavy shadow on the environment. Bovines produce methane when they pass gas. It
is estimated that a bovine produces, depending on the breed, anywhere between
100 litres to 500 litres of methane a day. This is equivalent to the per-day
carbon dioxide emissions of a car. India’s huge bovine population makes methane
a dangerous pollutant.
There is also the ecological problem.
Producing fodder for 324 million cows puts immense strain on scarce land and
water resources.
The Humane Society of India’s report
states: Animal agriculture occupies 30 per cent of the earth’s total land area.
Approximately 33 per cent of total arable land is used to produce feed crops,
in addition to vast areas of forested land that is clear-cut to graze or grow
feed for farmed animals.
What, then, is the alternative? Narain, who
is also a major in Ecology from the University of Oxford, suggests a
plant-based diet.
“The
government is using taxpayer money to subsidise dairy products (and indirectly
the leather and beef industries). What it should be doing is to promote the
production of protein-rich plant-based foods such as legumes, soybeans, pulses,
fruits and nuts using the land and water resources that are otherwise used to
produce cattle feed. That, and only that, will work if we are to put food on
the plates of our starving children.
Source: THE HINDU, Author : Anusha Narain
No comments:
Post a Comment